Dave is now insisting that I grade him, but I think this calls for multiple markers. Is his low similarity score to be applauded, or does his lack of serious academic citations give cause for concern?
How shall we grade Dave? Shall we rate #rhizo15 in terms of its MOOCiness? By the amount of connections we are making? By the multitude of blogs and posts and creative artefacts that are appearing? By the fact that we’ve made a prof from Edinburgh revisit some writing she did 11 years ago? (sorry @sianbayne) (not sorry) 😛
How do we measure #rhizo15? Can we come up with an appropriate rubric? We’ve put together a recipe for open learning, and we’re working on a definition of what counts in #rhizo15, so why not? Click here to join in.